As I already written, you can love or hate it. But at the same time I can understand it's not a movie for all tastes. By the way, the choice of Keanu Reeves and some screenplay bad errors and holes don't allow to give a 10. This Dracula is seductive as no other movies ever showed and as no other actor was able to portrait the dark prince. The music is wonderful, as cinematography, art/set direction, make up and costumes (who cares if Dracula wears John Lennon style sunglasses.). The other actors (except for Keanu Reeves, completely outcast and unable to act) are all good choices.
Winona Ryder is so sweet and adorable that I forgive the fact she hasn't been the best choice to play Mina. Definitely the best character of his career until now (let's see how he portrays Churchill in the Darkest Hour). Gary Oldman is absolutely fantastic, lavish, romantic,chilling, in particular as he plays an old Dracula in the beginning of the movie. Bram Stokers Dracula is a 1992 American Gothic horror film directed and produced by Francis Ford Coppola, based on the 1897 novel Dracula by Bram Stoker. Personally, I loved the way Coppola reviewed the classic tale, giving Dracula a reason to be what he became after the loss of his wife e to search in England the reincarnation of his lost love. It's a movie you can love or hate, there is no midway, as all comments prove. So, I can understand, but not agree, with all critics about important differences to Bram Stoker's masterpiece. In fact it is a very personal read of the original script. Anyway, I loved this movie, even if I agree that the title should have been F.F.Coppola's Dracula.
First of all, sorry for my English: I'm Italian and I don't know if I am able to express not in my language my thoughts with the proper terms.
0 kommentar(er)
